Skip to content
Skip to main content

Ding Darling: how art shapes a message

This article is part of “Students Investigate,” a series featuring the work and research of UI students. The following was written by Cecil Campbell, exhibition and engagement student lead for the Main Library Gallery.

Jay N. “Ding” Darling was a conservationist, an environmental activist, and most famously, a two-time Pulitzer Prize winning political cartoonist. The role that the political cartoonist has played throughout history is an important one, characterized in equal parts by political landscape, audience, and the actions (and reactions) of the politicians that feature in these cartoons. To understand what made Ding’s cartoons so impactful, we must first understand three concepts: humor, audience, and message.  

On the role of humor in political cartoons, scholar Abu Abraham writes, “Unlike the written or the spoken word, the effectiveness of the cartoon depends chiefly on the element of humour it contains.” It is important to remember that the political cartoon is just that: political. The partisan nature of politics, along with the editorial nature of the cartoon, means that when a cartoonist takes a stance on an issue (in politics, there’s always an “issue”), there’s also a group they take a stance against. The goal isn’t necessarily to provoke this opposing group into anger so much as it is to provide the cartoonist’s own perspective, for which humor acts as both argument and a shield of sorts. Abraham continues, “satire can often hurt deeper than a verbal assault; it can also have a softening effect on one’s opponent. Simple criticism or abuse may provoke, but satire persuades.” This is a point that Ding—as well as many other cartoonists—understood very well. For example, let’s look at a cartoon that seems at first glance to be making a joke at the expense of another political party.

A cartoon depicting prohibitionists learning that an elephant representing Congress is accepting alcohol from politicians.
Darling, Jay N. “It is always embarrassing to have the brewery wagon arrive when the minister is making a call.” Editorial Cartoons of Jay N. “Ding” Darling [MsC0170], Special Collections and Archives, University of Iowa Libraries. Copyright: J.N. “Ding” Darling Foundation.

This cartoon depicts an elephant (a stand-in for the Republican Party) looking back in embarrassment after answering the door to a large delivery of beer and wine while in the midst of entertaining a group of Prohibitionists. A note attached to the delivery identifies Woodrow Wilson as its sender. It might be easy to take this cartoon as an attack on the honesty of Republican members of congress—who are implied to have been sympathizing with prohibitionists and bootlegging alcohol at the same time—but the joke here isn’t quite so simple. The narrative is that someone’s been caught in a lie, and the exaggerated guilt and embarrassment shown by the elephant representing Republican Congress tells us that they’re the liars. We might take this to mean that we’re meant to sympathize with Wilson’s administration, or perhaps with the Prohibitionists who have been lied to. However, the friendly note addressed to Congress, as well as the incidental nature of the joke, places both political parties on the same side. If anything, the aged and comically scandalized Prohibitionists make up the punchline; their pearl clutching only adds to the humor. Abraham’s point about the softening effect of satire shines vividly through this cartoon. Ding tucks his message—being the commonplace refusal to abide by Prohibition—safely behind comedy, allowing an audience affiliated with any of the sides in this cartoon, be they Democrats, Republicans, or Prohibitionists, to acknowledge a truth that they may not have had it been portrayed critically.  

The second concept we must understand is the role that the audience plays related to political cartoons. Scholar Larry Bush refers to fellow author Raymond Morris’s term “skimmer” when discussing readers of political cartoons: “Most cartoons are a combination of illustration and text and are best understood by the person who skims the entire piece in order to grasp its meaning. For lack of a better term, ‘skimmer’ refers to a person who reads cartoons, while ‘reader’ refers to someone who is literate.” This term is useful when identifying what must go into a cartoon to make it skimmable. Because, as Bush mentions, cartoons are combinations of illustrations and text, the illustrations and text must relate to each other in a way that makes the whole cartoon easy to understand. The most common methods Ding used to do this were narrative elements like metaphors, symbols, and signage. The cartoon below contains all three:

A cartoon with a family in the background waiting for dinner while the cook sits in the kitchen and eats first, representing the Iowa legislature giving themselves raises.
Darling, Jay N. “Helping herself first: Of course, everybody wants the hired girl to have all she wants to eat, but she might at least wait until she gets the meal started for the rest of the household.” The Des Moines Register, March 22nd, 1911. Editorial Cartoons of Jay N. “Ding” Darling [MsC0170], Special Collections and Archives, University of Iowa Libraries. Copyright: J.N. “Ding” Darling Foundation.

The public-facing nature of political cartoons requires them to be understandable to even the least politically conscious reader, while still retaining the message intended by the cartoonist. “Helping Herself First” translates legislative corruption into cartoon format: a “hybrid of text, pictorial representations, symbols, shadings, and humor that become a puzzle…that is affectively engaging to skimmers.” This cartoon is full of symbols and pictorial representations, showing us how Ding uses metaphor to explain complicated topics from his perspective. Ding depicts the legislators—not as politicians with the power to control Iowa’s political future, but as a greedy housemaid. The family that this maid works for represents the citizens of Iowa. Reframing the relationship between legislators and their constituents in this way significantly changes who holds the power in that relationship: the legislators are people who work for and are employed by the citizens of Iowa. In other words, they work for us.  

Bush writes about “two types of symbols” described by E.H. Gombrich: “the natural metaphor and the ad hoc symbol. Natural metaphors are symbols that humans automatically understand…[these] include beauty versus ugliness and big versus small. These are especially useful for cartoonists in that they simplify the communication process.” We can see how Ding has used ugliness to negatively portray the legislators and prohibitionists in the last two cartoons. In the illustration below, we see an example of one of the many ways one could use the big versus small metaphor:

Cartoon of a huge crowd of people making their way to the US Capitol. People from various interests, like sportsmen, conservationists, and the next generation tell Congress that they want to see action when it comes to conservation.
Darling, Jay N. “The conservation interests can get what they need if they will pull together.” Editorial Cartoons of Jay N. “Ding” Darling [MsC0170], Special Collections and Archives, University of Iowa Libraries. Copyright: J.N. “Ding” Darling Foundation.

The size of the crowd in this cartoon completely dwarfs the two politicians the crowd is converging on, proving how quickly natural metaphors communicate information to readers. The size of the crowd communicates two things when compared with the size of the two politicians: the first being that the politicians have done something to make the crowd angry, the second being that the crowd has much more power than the politicians do. Natural metaphors play on the associations that audiences will automatically make, for example: big equals strong, small equals weak. The subject of this cartoon is the lack of support in Congress for environmental conservation. By arranging the two sides of this issue so that the conservationists take up as much space as they do, Ding is persuading the audience to take their side. Signs distinguish the different groups of people making up the crowd, and this has the benefit of both telling the audience who might care about conservation and giving them a chance to personally identify with a group that they might belong to.  

Though cartoons require a more interpretive approach for properly communicating their ideas than words do, author Sylvie Cannon writes, “if it is effective, the cartoon will synthetize perfectly the ideas and feelings that words will sometimes imperfectly convey. This is often achieved at the expense of complexity: issues will be reduced to simple terms as the cartoonist distills his material until the essence remains. The cartoon then makes us comprehend instantly the point the artist wants to make.” There are many ways of doing this, but few methods are as instantly comprehended as the use of shock value.  
 

One panel of the cartoon shows representations from public health education, medical science, surgical skill and more being directed toward a family in need. It says "in the science of saving lives." The panel below shows a war scene and says "and in mass murder."
Darling, Jay N. “A hundred years of progress—” December 28, 1940. Editorial Cartoons of Jay N. “Ding” Darling [MsC0170], Special Collections and Archives, University of Iowa Libraries. Copyright: J.N. “Ding” Darling Foundation.

It is plainly obvious which part of this cartoon is meant to convey shock, but that doesn’t lessen its effect. Shock can be a controversial tactic to use for getting an audience’s attention, as it usually involves showing the audience something upsetting, often unexpectedly. When used correctly, shock value doesn’t need to exaggerate the upsetting aspects of what it shows us to be effective; it simply needs to be honest.  

The first panel of this cartoon highlights different milestones in medical science as a crowd of doctors and nurses approach a sickly-looking family. The contrast between this panel and the second is stark. A bomber plane flies over the wreckage of a town destroyed by war; mangled corpses lay gape-mouthed next to craters and rubble as the plane drops missiles on more buildings in the distance. Ding did not have a reputation for shying away from harsh truths, and this cartoon is only one of many that prove that. The text at the top of this panel, reading “…and in mass murder,” bluntly states what cannot be sanitized for the reader’s comfort. The honesty in this scene is what makes the shock of it so effective, leaving an impression that stays with the reader even after they’ve turned the page.  

The political cartoon is a deceptively simple thing, one that only gets more complicated the closer it’s examined. It takes a unique understanding of both visual and narrative storytelling for the cartoonist to translate their opinion into an image or two that tells an audience exactly what they mean, using as few words as possible. The examples in this article highlight a few of Ding Darling’s methods for achieving this, but something that cannot be ignored is the personality that comes through in every cartoon. Ding gained the notoriety that he had not just because of the cartoons he drew, but because there was something about his wit, humor, and style that kept readers coming back to read more. In Ding’s case, the cartoons he drew weren’t only expressions of his opinion; they were extensions of himself.  

Cecil Campbell installing his pop-up exhibit at FilmScene for the Refocus Film Festival, October 2026.

This article is a companion to Cecil Campbell’s pop-up exhibit at the 2026 Refocus Film Festival at FilmScene in Iowa City. Ding Darling: How Art Shapes a Message is in conversation with the fall 2026 Main Library Gallery exhibition, It’s Been Wonderful Knowing You: Wildlife Conservation and Advocacy Through the Lens of Jay N. “Ding” Darling.

Bibliography: 
Abraham, A. (1975). “Anatomy of the Political Cartoon.” India International Centre Quarterly, 2(4), 273–279. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23001883   

Bush, L. (2013). “More than Words: Rhetorical Constructs in American Political Cartoons.” Studies in American Humor, (27), 63–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23823980   

Cannon, S., & Cannon, S. (1990). “Editorial cartoons and the American involvement in Vietnam.” Revue Française d’études Américaines, (43), 59–83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20872048  

Curator Q&A with Collin Vandewalle

It’s Been Wonderful Knowing You: Wildlife Conservation and Advocacy Through the Lens of Jay N. “Ding” Darling, the fall 2026 exhibition in the University of Iowa Main Library Gallery, features the work of a Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist from Iowa who was a major catalyst for the modern American conservation movement. From original cartoons and photographs to correspondence and natural history specimens, each item on display helps tell the story of Darling’s efforts to save America’s wildlife and natural resources. 

Collin Vandewalle, exhibition co-curator and Sackner Archive project archivist, next to materials from the Jay N. “Ding” Darling Papers, Special Collections and Archives, UI Libraries.

Collin Vandewalle, Sackner Archive project archivist in Special Collections and Archives, co-curated the exhibition with Lindsay Moen, lead public services librarian in the same department. Through his research for the exhibit’s narrative and his time working closely with the Jay N. “Ding” Darling Papers, Vandewalle has gained significant expertise about Darling and his life’s work. 

Question: How did you become involved in the exhibition project, and what did you enjoy most about the process? 
Answer: I was a graduate student at the University of Iowa’s School of Library and Information Science and worked in Special Collections and Archives as a student lead. I worked specifically with the Darling Papers, so my then-supervisor—and now colleague—Lindsay Moen asked if I wanted to help her curate the Darling exhibit. I eagerly accepted so I could have a chance to apply all the knowledge I had gained about him. My favorite aspect of the process was the chance to tell a story about a side of Darling that not many people know about: his environmental conservation work.   

Q: What draws you most to the story of Ding Darling? 
A: I was drawn in most by his unwavering and unending zeal to help protect the natural resources of our country. Not many other people can claim they have worked so hard to save native migratory fowl, especially ducks, as Darling did, and I really admire that fervor.  

Q: As a curator, researcher, and Iowan, what does this exhibit mean to you personally? 
A:  I think it is important to tell the stories of prominent Iowans like Ding Darling and highlight the fantastic history this state has had when it comes to environmental conservation causes. It is so important to connect today’s Iowans to our scientific roots and reflect on how we can continue this kind of work in our state. I am proud that I can take all the research I have done and highlight this history through a curated exhibit. 

Q: When did you first hear about Ding Darling, and how have you worked with his materials over time?   
A: I had my first encounter with Ding Darling’s legacy when I was nine years old on a family trip to Florida. We went to the J.N. “Ding” Darling National Wildlife Refuge, and it was such a fantastic experience that I still remember it vividly 20 years later. I had my second encounter with Darling during my undergraduate experience at Drake University in Des Moines. I worked in the University Archives and Special Collections at the Cowles Library on campus and helped with another Darling exhibit that Drake hosted in 2017. I then worked with his papers for just over three years here at the University of Iowa. 

Q: Why is it important to have this exhibit in the Main Library Gallery?  
A: I think it is important that the campus community and the broader public gain a better understanding of just how robust the Darling collection is here at the University of Iowa Libraries. It is also amazing that we have the capability to showcase rare materials—like a presidential letter from Franklin Delano Roosevent to Darling, for example—in a safe and professional way through the Main Library Gallery.   

Q: What are some of the most surprising things you learned during your research? 
A: I was most surprised by just how interconnected Darling was with the politics and culture of his time. It seems like he knew every prominent figure from the turn of the 20th century. He met with Henry Ford, Theodore Roosevelt, Herbert Hoover, Walt Disney, Aldo Leopold, and many more celebrities.   

Q: What is your favorite object in the exhibit? 
A: My favorite object would be the letter from Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) to Darling where he claimed that Darling had pulled the largest “heist” on the United States Treasury in American history. The letter is an amazing piece of history that highlights the tensions that FDR and Darling had for one another, particularly when it came to funding priorities. One will have to come to the exhibit to learn the context of this surreal letter.  

Letter transcript:

THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON

July 29, 1935.

Dear Jay:—

As I was saying to the Acting Director of the Budget the other day—”this fellow Darling is the only man in history who got an appropriation through Congress, past the Budget and signed by the President without anybody realizing that the Treasury had been raided.”

You hold an all-time record. In addition to the six million dollars ($6,000,000) you got, the Federal Courts say that the United States Government has a perfect constitutional right to condemn millions of acres for the welfare, health and happiness of ducks, geese, sandpipers, owls and wrens, but has no constitutional right to condemn a few old tenaments [sic] in the slums for the health and happiness of the little boys and girls who will be our citizens of the next generation!

Nevertheless, more power to your arm! Go ahead with the six million dollars ($6,000,000) and talk with me about a month hence in regard to additional lands, if I have any more money left.

As ever yours,
President Roosevelt

Honorable J.N. Darling,
Bureau of Biological Survey,
South Building,
Washington, D.C.
Letter from President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to Jay N. “Ding” Darling, July 29, 1935. Presidential Letters Collection, Special Collections and Archives, UI Libraries.

Q: What about Darling’s life and work do you hope visitors will take away from their time in the exhibit? 
A: I hope they leave the exhibit understanding that even just one person can spark change when it comes to environmental conservation. I hope they can see that Darling set a fantastic precedent on how we, too, can help protect the ducks and other wildlife of Iowa! 

Q: The Jay N. “Ding” Darling Papers in Special Collections have recently had some significant updates that make them even more accessible to researchers. What was your role in this project?  
A: My main role was making sure the Darling Papers were easier to use and more accessible to the public before the exhibit started. This meant that I rehoused a majority of the collection into newer archival grade boxes that will protect the material far longer into the future. I also spent a great deal of time intellectually reorganizing the finding aid so that researchers will have an easier time finding specific information from this extensive collection. 

Q: Is there anything else you would like to share? 
A: I want to thank everyone involved in making this exhibit come to life. It was a fantastic experience to co-curate this project at the start of my professional career.  

I hope everyone who comes to the exhibit leaves having learned at least one new thing about Darling or wildlife conservation. For those interested in a more in-depth look at Darling, I also worked with recent graduate student Hailee McCormick to create a 150-year timeline that spans Darling’s entire life and the institutions that make up his legacy up to 2026. That will be available online soon. 

It’s Been Wonderful Knowing You: Wildlife Conservation and Advocacy Through the Lens of Jay N. “Ding” Darling will be on display through Dec. 18, 2026. The Main Library Gallery is open daily. Learn more about open hours: lib.uiowa.edu/gallery. 

Mahler’s influence on James Dixon

The following was compiled by Cecil Campbell, exhibition and engagement student lead for the Main Library Gallery, and features select exhibition text by Sarah Suhadolnik and Katie Buehner.

During his considerable tenure as conductor of the Quad City Symphony Orchestra, James Dixon developed a reputation for programming modern compositions, which occasionally ruffled the feathers of his more traditional-minded audience members. Though he faced some objections, Dixon’s love for the music he conducted ultimately led to a wider appreciation in his audiences for newer or more avant-garde compositions. Amidst the repertory Dixon conducted, the works of Gustav Mahler (1860–1911) figure prominently.

Gustav Mahler was born in Bohemia but spent a great deal of his professional life as a composer and conductor in Vienna. His last few years were spent as the music director of the New York Philharmonic (1909–1911), the longest consistently operating orchestra in the United States. No composer of orchestral music exploited the orchestra’s grandness like Mahler. He composed sprawling symphonic works of such breadth that just one can fill an entire concert program. His nine mammoth symphonies require enormous performing forces (up to 500 musicians for the Eighth Symphony) and often stretch over an hour in length (up to 100 minutes for the Third Symphony), making attempts to keep the composer’s music in the public ear a major event. Fearing such a limited program would result in low ticket sales, the Tri-City (now Quad City) Symphony Orchestra avoided programming a Mahler symphony until 1979, when Dixon conducted Symphony No. 2, “Resurrection,” with Martha Sheil (soprano) and Anne Larson (mezzo-soprano) and choirs from Augustana College joining for the performance. The symphony—nearly an hour and a half long—elicited an awed and intense reaction from the crowd. 

In response to James Dixon’s conducting of Mahler’s second symphony, The Sunday Dispatch headline read, “Symphony concert of the decade,” with reviewer Bill McElwain in ecstasy over the “powerfully stunning performance of the Mahler Symphony no. 2.” 

Mahler once told another composer, “The symphony must be like the world, it must embrace everything.” His symphonic world included a wide array of musical styles and types, including sound effects evoking natural settings (e.g., birdsong, cowbells, bellowing horns), military marches, folk songs, chorales, funeral dirges, children’s music, and playful musical jokes. To conduct Mahler is to explore, with a complex and wide-ranging sound map, the many places in life where sound and music play a role. 

For his last performances with the Quad City Symphony Orchestra—April 9 and 10, 1994, at the Adler Theater in Davenport, Iowa, and Centennial Hall in Rock Island, Illinois—James Dixon selected Symphony No. 5 by Gustav Mahler. 

A composer with an incredible legacy and impact, the influence that Mahler had on Dixon comes as no surprise. The choice to perform one of Mahler’s symphonies for his last performance speaks to an open mind and considerable talent.  

Learn more about James Dixon and his accomplishments both locally and abroad in the spring 2026 Main Library Gallery exhibit Orchestrating Community: The Public Service of Iowa Conductor James Dixon. 

James Dixon’s lasting impact on the Quad City Symphony Orchestra 

The following was compiled by Cecil Campbell, exhibition and engagement student lead for the Main Library Gallery, and features select exhibition text by Sarah Suhadolnik and Katie Buehner.

In 1916, the Tri-Cities area—Rock Island, Illinois; Moline, Illinois; and Davenport, Iowa—was the smallest community in the country to support a full symphony orchestra. Now the Quad City Symphony Orchestra (QCSO), it is one of the oldest continuously operating orchestras in the United States.

In 1965, 37-year-old James Dixon was hired as the music director, appointing him steward of this legacy and the most recent director in a line of (at the time) seven before him. Although Dixon’s programming choices initially tested the tastes of audiences and administrators alike, he quickly garnered a reputation for steady leadership.

While learning to work with professional musicians, Dixon also grew into his role in the organization’s ongoing efforts to secure subscribers—members of the community who provide essential annual support. The care and discipline Dixon brought to his work transformed him into a local celebrity. While that may seem like high praise, Dixon’s celebrity status could be seen in more than just reputation. For example, at the time Dixon joined the QCSO as conductor, the organization had a modest budget. By the time he retired in 1994, budgets were significantly larger owing to his fundraising efforts. 

Dixon’s—and the QCSO’s—long-term investment in local community has paid large dividends. When one considers not only how important the orchestra is—and was—to its audiences, but to the musicians themselves, it makes his level of commitment stand out all the more. As one of the Quad Cities’ oldest community groups, it makes sense that the QCSO has played a significant role not just in the lives of area residents, but in many of its members’ lives as well.

In a now-archived blog post from the Davenport Public Library’s website, special collections librarian Sarah J. Wesson wrote, “The Symphony has remained a cohesive group, weathering storms and uncertainties together. Though none of the original [early] musicians remain, of course, many of the current members have been with the orchestra for a remarkable length of time.” 

After 29 years with the QCSO, James Dixon left an impression as significant as his orchestra. Former QCSO executive director Lance Willett said,  “I think it’s something that rarely, if ever, will be seen again in most communities. That kind of dedication and connection to a community…is the sort of relationship that exists very, very, rarely.”

Learn more about James Dixon and his local impact in the spring 2026 Main Library Gallery exhibit, Orchestrating Community: The Public Service of Iowa Conductor James Dixon, which closes June 26.