{"id":5789,"date":"2016-12-01T19:29:12","date_gmt":"2016-12-01T19:29:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/needtoknow\/?p=1128"},"modified":"2016-12-01T19:29:12","modified_gmt":"2016-12-01T19:29:12","slug":"pubmed-food-problem-cruciferous-vegetables","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/2016\/12\/01\/pubmed-food-problem-cruciferous-vegetables\/","title":{"rendered":"PubMed Food Problem: Cruciferous Vegetables"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"cruciferousvegetables1\"<\/p>\n

\"cruciferousvegetables_690x345\"<\/a><\/p>\n

To do a PubMed search for cruciferous vegetables that includes such species as Radish, Arugula and Wasabi, each species must be done separately.<\/em><\/p>\n

By Eric Rumsey, Janna Lawrence and Xiaomei Gu<\/p>\n

In order to do successful searches for cruciferous vegetables in PubMed, it helps to know exactly what \u201ccruciferous\u201d means, which makes it easier to understand what vegetables are considered \u201ccruciferous\u201d and the botanical relationships among them. We have discussed these topics in a companion article<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In general, cruciferous vegetables are considered to be any plants in the family Brassicaceae that are edible. Most of these, especially the more popular ones (cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, brussel sprouts) are in the genus <\/span>Brassica<\/span><\/i>. A few others are in other genera in the family, the most notable being Radish (<\/span>Raphanus<\/span><\/i>), Daikon (<\/span>Raphanus<\/span><\/i>), Arugula (<\/span>Eruca<\/span><\/i>), Horseradish (<\/span>Armoracia<\/span><\/i>), White mustard (<\/span>Sinapis<\/span><\/i>), Garden cress (Lepidium) and Wasabi (<\/span>Wasabia<\/span><\/i>). With most edible members of the family Brassicaceae being in the genus Brassica, then, searching for that genus works well for most cruciferous vegetables. But without including the MeSH terms for all of the other edible genera in the family, there is no easy way to do a comprehensive search for them as a group.<\/span><\/p>\n

With edible species in several genera in the Brassicaceae family, it might seem like a way to include all of them would be to search for the family name, since it\u2019s an explosion that contains all of the genera in the family. We have seen this done by MeSH indexers in some cases, but it has problems. For one thing, the family is very large, containing 372 genera, so searching for the family name can retrieve many inappropriate citations. This is especially a problem because one of the genera in the family is Arabidopsis, a very commonly used research subject in plant genetics, having nothing at all to do with nutrition. Arabidopsis is something like the Drosophila of the plant world. So of course searching for the exploded MeSH term Brassicaceae gets a flood of articles on Arabidopsis; approximately 80% of all articles retrieved from this search are indexed to the narrower term Arabidopsis.<\/span><\/p>\n

We found another problem in how cruciferous vegetables are treated in PubMed indexing when we looked at sample of 30 articles with \u201ccruciferous\u201d in the title. \u00a0Twenty-eight of the 30 articles actually had the phrase \u201ccruciferous vegetables\u201d in the title, but \u00a0in about \u2153 of the 30 articles, there was no indexing term at all correlated with the word \u201ccruciferous,\u201d and the indexing term used was just \u201cvegetables,\u201d ignoring the word \u201ccruciferous.\u201d Another problem we found in this sample is that, of the articles that had an indexing term correlated with \u201ccruciferous,\u201d the term that was usually used was the family name, Brassicaceae, which retrieves many non-food-related citations, as discussed above.<\/span><\/p>\n

Suggestions for improving indexing of cruciferous foods<\/b><\/p>\n

Because there is currently no way to search for cruciferous foods as a group, we would suggest that NLM should add a new MeSH term <cruciferous foods>. This would not only put all of these foods under one term, it would also provide a term to use for articles that use the term itself in the title or abstract.<\/span><\/p>\n

Image at top of article is from Wikipedia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\"cruciferousvegetables1\"To do a PubMed search for cruciferous vegetables that includes such species as Radish, Arugula and Wasabi, each species must be done separately. By Eric Rumsey, Janna Lawrence and Xiaomei […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":167,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5789"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5789"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5789\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5861,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5789\/revisions\/5861"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lib.uiowa.edu\/combo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}